Crunchy Granola, along with a host of other people, is writing about the right to marry today.
Twelve and a half years ago, on a misty day, MS and I were married by a judge who wore bright red barn boots. We were married at my mom's house, in a big tent, with our family and friends around us.
There was no religious component to our wedding. We wrote our own vows, exchanged rings, and signed the paper. Love made that misty day sunshine-y and beautiful.
There was nothing about our wedding (except, perhaps the clothes we wore) that would have been different if we had been two women or two men instead of a man and a woman. There is nothing about our marriage (except, perhaps the way we conceived our child) that would be different if we were two women or two men instead of a man and a woman.
We are a white man and a white woman married to each other and living in Virginia. If we were a bi-racial couple 40 years ago, our marriage would not have been legal in the state we live in. If we were a same-sex couple now, our marriage would not be legal in most states, including the state we live in.
In the same way that it was wrong to out-law bi-racial marriages, it is wrong to out-law same-sex marriages. A marriage should be a union between two adults who love each other.
If you live in California, vote NO on Prop 8.
Through My Glasses, Dorkily
13 years ago
1 comment:
i'm in CA, and voting no. my daughter is voting absentee, and voting no.
yesterday, i got the only robocall of the season that i appreciated. DiFi, the league of women voters, and teh CA teachers' federation were calling to urge a no vote on prop 8.
Post a Comment